Race and Sex Differences in QRS Interval and Associated Outcome Among Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Jump to

Abstract
Background Prolonged QRS duration is associated with increased mortality among heart failure patients, but race or sex differences in QRS duration and associated effect on outcomes are unknown.
Methods and Results We investigated QRS duration and morphology among 2463 black and white patients with heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% who underwent coronary angiography and 12‐lead electrocardiography at Duke University Hospital from 1995 through 2011. We used multivariable Cox regression models to assess the relationship between QRS duration and all‐cause mortality and investigate race‐QRS and sex‐QRS duration interaction. Median QRS duration was 105 ms (interquartile range [IQR], 92–132) with variation by race and sex (P<0.001). QRS duration was longest in white men (111 ms; IQR, 98–139) followed by white women (108 ms; IQR, 92–140), black men (100 ms; IQR, 91–120), and black women (94 ms; IQR, 86–118). Left bundle branch block was more common in women than men (24% vs 14%) and in white (21%) versus black individuals (12%). In black patients, there was a 16% increase in risk of mortality for every 10 ms increase in QRS duration up to 112 ms (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07, 1.25) that was not present among white patients (interaction, P=0.06).
Conclusions Black individuals with heart failure had a shorter QRS duration and more often had non‐left bundle branch block morphology than white patients. Women had left bundle branch block more commonly than men. Among black patients, modest QRS prolongation was associated with increased mortality.
Introduction
Prolonged QRS duration (>120 ms) may be associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death and all‐cause mortality.1, 2 More than 20% of individuals with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) have a QRS duration ≥120 ms.2, 3 QRS duration is longer in healthy men than women4, 5, 6 and longer in healthy white individuals than black.5, 7, 8 However, among patients with reduced LVEF, less is known about race and sex differences in QRS duration and morphology and associated outcomes.2
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve functional status, decrease hospitalizations, and improve survival in appropriately selected patients with heart failure (HF).9, 10 Predictors of a favorable response to CRT include female sex, nonischemic etiology of systolic HF, left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology, and prolonged QRS duration.11 However, CRT is underutilized in the overall HF population,12, 13 and black individuals are less likely to have CRT devices implanted than their white counterparts, despite being disproportionately affected by HF and having a higher prevalence of some factors predicting a favorable CRT response.12, 14, 15 Although black women are more likely than black men to have CRT devices implanted, the data are conflicting as to whether women overall have an equal likelihood of receiving a CRT device as their male counterparts.12, 16 Whether race and sex differences in CRT are attributable, in part, to differences in QRS duration and morphology is currently not well understood.
The purpose of this study is to assess race and sex differences in QRS duration and morphology among patients with reduced LVEF and investigate the association of QRS duration with mortality as a function of race and sex.
Methods
Data Sources
Data for this analysis were abstracted and merged from 3 sources: the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease (DDCD), Duke Heart Station, and Duke Echocardiography Database. The DDCD and its data elements have been previously described.17 Briefly, the DDCD is a single‐center database established in the 1960s that collects clinical characteristics of all patients who undergo cardiac catheterization at Duke University Medical Center (DUMC; Durham, NC) and continues to follow these patients for assessment of outcomes. The Duke Heart Station and Duke Echocardiography Database store electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiogram (echo) variables, respectively, on each patient who has an ECG or echo at DUMC. The Duke University Hospital Internal Review Board approved use of these data for the purposes of this study and waived the requirement for informed consent.
Patient Population
We examined 92 135 cardiac catheterization procedures that occurred at the DUMC between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2011. Index catheterization was determined by taking the earliest qualifying catheterization for a given patient. The 12‐lead ECG data include computer‐generated measurements of the relevant electrocardiographic intervals (PR, QRS, QT, and RR) as analyzed using Philips TraceMaster ECG software (Andover, MA).4, 18, 19 We included ECGs within 1 month of the index cardiac catheterization, and, in the case of multiple ECGs, we selected the one closest to the index procedure. LVEF was determined primarily from Duke Echocardiography Database quantification. In the case where LVEF was not available at the time of the index catheterization, LVEF data were obtained from the closest source within 3 months preceding and 1 month following the index catheterization. The sources of additional LVEF data included nuclear imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, or left ventriculography. Patients without LVEF assessment or QRS interval documentation were excluded.
Only patients with LVEF ≤35% were included in the analysis. Patients were excluded for missing data on race, key baseline characteristics, myocardial infarction (MI) within 30 days preceding the index catheterization, or revascularization within the previous 3 months. Patients with ventricular pacing, an uninterpretable ECG, and those taking flecainide or propafenone were excluded. To exclude potentially erroneous QRS estimates, ECGs with QRS interval missing or considered to be outside the range of feasible physiological values >200 ms were excluded (Figure 1). Our analysis population consisted of 2463 patients. Patient‐reported race was classified at the time of data collection as black or white. Patients with racial classifications other than black or white were excluded. We repeated the primary analysis among patients who met all the primary exclusion criteria with the addition of those patients who had ventricular pacing in order to account for the subset of patients with CRT (N=2678).
Flow diagram for final study population. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass graft; CHF, congestive heart failure; ECG, electrocardiogram; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Outcomes
We examined the distribution of QRS duration, the prevalence of LBBB, right bundle branch block (RBBB), and intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD), and the association between QRS duration and all‐cause mortality by race and sex. Sensitivity analyses were performed including patients with paced rhythms, in order to assess the distribution of QRS duration and morphology and the association between QRS duration and mortality by race. Follow‐up data were obtained by self‐administered questionnaires and telephone contact at 6 months post–index catheterization and every year thereafter on the anniversary of the initial presentation. The National Death Index was used to determine vital status for nonresponders.20, 21, 22 Eighty‐six percent of patients had complete follow‐up for at least 1.6 years, and median follow‐up for those who survived was 6.3 years.
Statistical Analysis
We identified baseline characteristics of study subjects in each of 4 race‐sex groups (black men, white men, black women, and white women). Median, 25th, and 75th percentiles (interquartile range; IQR) were reported for continuous variables and percentages were reported for categorical variables. We used a Kruskal–Wallis test to compare the distribution of the QRS duration across the 4 race‐sex groups. We then assessed differences in the QRS duration distribution between pair‐wise comparisons for each of the 4 race‐sex groups using Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests. We also identified the distribution of black and white subjects in 3 clinically relevant QRS duration distributions: QRS <120 ms, QRS 120 to 149 ms, and QRS ≥150 ms.2
We used multivariable Cox regression modeling to assess the relationship between the QRS duration and the time from index catheterization to all‐cause mortality. One analysis of the relationship used the QRS duration as a continuous variable and another used QRS prolongation as a categorical variable. QRS prolongation was defined as QRS interval >120 ms, given that previous studies have demonstrated worse outcomes in HF patients with QRS ≥120 ms.23, 24, 25, 26 Covariates were prespecified based on a minimum of 10 events per variable. Based on previous research, as well as statistical and clinical judgment, the model was adjusted for age at catheterization, baseline glomerular filtrate rate (GFR), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, LVEF, Duke coronary artery severity index,25, 27 heart rate, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), chronic obstructive lung disease, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), year of ECG, and body mass index (BMI).
As part of the multivariable Cox regression modeling process, linearity assumptions for the model were checked by examining the results of cubic polynomial spline plots of the log hazard ratio (HR) of a death against the continuous QRS duration and each of the continuous or categorical adjustment variables.28 Transformations were then determined for each of the adjustment variables that had a significant nonlinear relationship.
Multivariable Cox regression modeling was also used to determine whether the relationship between QRS duration and all‐cause mortality depended on race or sex. Given the lack of significance of interaction between the QRS interval with sex, we did not further explore differences in the relationship between QRS interval and mortality by sex.
Kaplan–Meier plots were created for all‐cause mortality stratified by race and prolonged QRS duration to illustrate the difference in event rates across these strata. We also created adjusted spline curves of the predicted 3‐year risk of mortality across the QRS duration for the overall population and for each race.
All statistical tests were 2‐sided, and a P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were conducted at the Duke Clinical Research Institute using SAS software (version 9.4; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). The authors had full access to the data in the study and take responsibility for the data analysis and its integrity.
Results
Baseline Patient Characteristics
Table 1 summarizes baseline characteristics across race and sex groups. Median age varied across groups with black individuals younger; black men 55 (interquartile range [IQR], 47–64), white men 64 (IQR, 55–73), black women 58 (IQR, 47–69), and white women 66 (IQR, 57–75). Black patients had more hypertension (77.0% vs 64.9%) and left ventricular hypertrophy (57.7% vs 44.8%) than white patients. Relative to black patients, white patients had a higher incidence of previous MI (31.2% vs 15.8%), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; 18.2% vs 9.7%), and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; 30.7% vs 10.5%). Black (25.6%) and white women (22.7%) were less likely to have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) than black (30.1%) and white men (30.6%).
Differences in QRS Duration and Morphology by Race and Sex
Median QRS duration was 105 ms (IQR, 92–132), and the distribution of the QRS interval varied significantly by race and sex (P<0.001). The median QRS interval was shortest among black females (94.0 ms) followed by black males (100.0 ms), white females (107.5 ms), and white males (111.0 ms; Figure 2; Table 2). The distribution of QRS interval was similar when including patients with paced rhythms (Table 3). Comparisons between each group demonstrated distributional differences in the QRS interval for each pair (P<0.001), with the exception of white males versus white females (P=0.092). Evaluation of QRS duration across clinical cutoffs of <120, 120 to 149, and ≥150 ms showed that black HF patients were less likely to have QRS prolongation at each interval (Table 2).
Box plots of QRS interval by race and sex. The horizontal line marks a QRS duration of 120 ms. In the figure, diamonds indicate the mean QRS, horizontal lines within the box indicates the median. The box extends from the 25th to the 75th percentile, and the vertical whiskers extend to the minimum and maximum values, or to the 75th percentile plus 1.5 times the distance between the 75th and 25th percentile. Open circles indicate individual data values beyond the whiskers.
Interventricular conduction abnormalities were more common among white patients than black patients (Table 2). LBBB was present in 20.8% of white patients and 12.3% of black patients. Both white and black women were approximately twice as likely to have LBBB as their male counterparts. However, RBBB and nonspecific IVCD were more common in men than women.
Association Between QRS Duration and Mortality by Race and Sex
One hundred fifty patients (6.1%) were excluded from the mortality assessment because of missing data. Of the remaining 2313 patients, 1301 died during follow‐up. Median follow‐up of patients who survived throughout the analysis was 6.3 years for both black and white patients. The unadjusted Kaplan–Meier mortality rate for the overall population at 14 years was 74.7%. After adjustment, black patients with a QRS >120 ms had a 25% higher risk of mortality than black patients with a QRS <120 ms. White patients with a QRS >120 ms had a 2% higher risk of mortality than white patients with a QRS duration <120 ms (Table 4; Figure 3).
Adjusted mortality rates by QRS variation and race. Yellow, black individuals QRS >120 ms; gray, black individuals QRS ≤120 ms; orange, white individuals QRS >120 ms; blue, white individuals QRS ≤120 ms. P=0.003. P‐value represents comparison across the four subgroups.
In the overall population, the relationship between QRS duration and mortality was nonlinear, in that the mortality risk increased as the QRS duration increased until 112 ms. After 112 ms, the risk of mortality did not appear to change as the QRS duration increased. After adjusting for baseline covariates, every 10 ms increase in QRS duration below 112 ms was associated with a 10% increase in risk of mortality over the follow‐up period (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04, 1.15; Table 4). There was a nonsignificant trend in race‐based, but no sex‐based, differences in the association between QRS duration and mortality. Accounting for the race‐based differences, it was estimated that among black patients, a 10 ms increase in the QRS duration below 112 ms was associated with a 16% increase in risk of mortality (interaction of QRS <112 ms and race, P=0.06). The association between progressive QRS prolongation below 112 ms and mortality was not significant among white patients. When analyzing the black population in our cohort, increases in QRS duration were associated with higher 3‐year predicted mortality rates. A similar trend in predicted mortality rates was not observed in white patients (Figure 4B and 4C).
A, Adjusted expected 3‐year mortality rates for the overall population by QRS interval. B, Adjusted expected 3‐year mortality rates for the black population by QRS interval. C, Adjusted expected 3‐year mortality rates for the white population by QRS interval. BMI indicates body mass index; CHF_SEV, congestive heart failure severity; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DIASBP, diastolic blood pressure; DM_PRED, diabetes mellitus and prediabetes; DUKEINDX PULSE, Duke coronary artery severity index; ECGYEAR, year of electrocardiogram; EF, ejection fraction; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HXCABG, history of coronary artery bypass graft; HXPVD, history of peripheral vascular disease.
As a sensitivity analysis, the association between QRS duration and mortality by race was tested in a population of patients that included paced rhythms. The results of this analysis did not differ significantly from the primary analysis (Table 5).
Discussion
There are 3 important findings in our study. First, QRS prolongation and LBBB morphology were less common among black HF patients than their white counterparts. Second, LBBB was more common among women than men independent of race. Finally, among black HF patients, modest QRS prolongation was associated with an increase in mortality after adjustment, whereas there was no significant association between QRS duration and mortality among white patients. Similarly, there were no significant sex differences in the relationship between QRS duration and mortality.
Differences in QRS Duration and Morphology by Race
Our analysis found that QRS prolongation, IVCD, and LBBB were more common among white patients than black patients with systolic HF. These findings are consistent with previous studies among patients with3, 29 and without HF.5, 7, 8 One study with 936 black, white, and Hispanic patients demonstrated that black patients with HF were less likely to have a QRS >120 seconds (15.8% black, 26% white, and 25.3% Hispanic; P=0.01).3 Hebert et al also found that LBBB morphology was most common among Hispanic patients (14.3%) followed by white individuals (8.8%) and black individuals (5.8%; P=0.002). This study did not assess the association between QRS morphology and clinical outcomes. A retrospective analysis of the Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study with Tolvaptan (EVEREST) trial found that QRS prolongation in a cohort of hospitalized HF patients was more common among white patients than black patients (P<0.01).29
Given that QRS duration >150 ms and LBBB morphology are important in determining the eligibility for implantation of CRT devices, differences in prevalence of conduction abnormality between races may partially explain the differences in use of CRT by race. Piccini et al found significantly lower odds of CRT use among black patients than white patients in the GWTG‐HF registry; however, this analysis was limited by the inability to adjust for NHYA class, QRS duration, or morphology.12 The failure of black HF patients to meet criteria for CRT implantation is not likely to completely explain the underutilization of CRT devices in black relative to white individuals. The following year, Farmer et al used the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) to assess ICD and CRT defibrillator (CRT‐D) use by race and found that eligible black patients had 26% lower odds of receiving CRT‐D than white patients.14 The NCDR registry captures QRS duration, morphology, NYHA class, and duration of HF symptoms, thus increasing the likelihood that patients included in the analysis were eligible to receive CRT.
The presence of racial differences in QRS duration and morphology that are evident in both healthy subjects and patients with systolic HF indicates that these differences may be, in part, determined through the interaction of genetic variants, comorbidities, and environmental exposures. Several studies have sought to identify genetic variants underlying these racial differences. Genome‐wide association studies have identified an association between a nonsynonymous single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the SCN10A gene and prolonged QRS duration.30 This gene encodes a voltage‐gated sodium channel expressed in cardiac tissue. Similarly, the SCN5A gene encodes the most common voltage‐gated sodium channel in the human heart. Investigators studied the SCN5A gene among 4558 black patients from Jackson, Mississippi, and found 4 SNPs associated with decreased QRS duration and 1 SNP associated with longer QRS duration.31 Jeff et al discovered similar findings using 455 patients in the Vanderbilt Genome‐Electronic Records Project and Northwestern University NUgene Project.32 These studies support the concept that there may be a genetic component to QRS duration that varies by self‐reported race. These findings warrant further investigation. Last, the higher prevalence of nonischemic etiology of systolic HF in black individuals may lend itself to lower scar burden and thus less interventricular electrical delay relative to their white counterparts, who exhibit a higher burden of ischemic etiology of systolic HF.
Differences in QRS Duration and Morphology by Race and Sex
Among healthy study participants, QRS duration is longer in men than in women.4, 5, 6 In our analysis, QRS prolongation was more common in black men than black women, but there was no difference between white men and women. Differences in QRS duration by both race and sex are infrequently reported. In one of the few analyses focused on this subject, Hebert et al found no differences in QRS duration between black men and black women or white men and white women, though the QRS duration was shorter in black individuals than white individuals.3 Additionally, this analysis found no differences in QRS duration between men and women. This cohort consisted of patients with reduced LVEF, although the small sample size limited the power to detect differences across subgroups. The inadequate reporting of QRS duration by race and sex along with the divergent findings of the available data suggest the need for more race‐ and sex‐balanced inclusion to determine the true differences between populations.
Our study found that LBBB was more common for women than men of either race. This finding is consistent with an analysis of the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. Despite finding that QRS duration >120 ms was more common in men than women, Linde et al found that LBBB was more common in women (27%) than men (24%).13 LBBB carries both therapeutic and prognostic implications for HF patients, given that those with LVEF ≤35% and LBBB morphology meet either class I or IIa indications for CRT implantation depending on the degree of QRS prolongation.33 A higher incidence of LBBB morphology was also identified in women enrolled in the SMART‐AV trial34 and other observational studies.3
Association Between QRS Duration and Mortality
Among black HF patients, we found an association between progressive QRS prolongation and mortality. However, this association was only present up to a QRS duration of 112 ms and was not present in white patients. Mentz et al analyzed a population of black study participants in Jackson, Mississippi, and found that QRS prolongation was associated with an increased risk of mortality across all spectrums of QRS duration.35 Similarly, progressive QRS duration is typically associated with worse outcomes among HF patients.24, 25, 28 Conversely, an observational study of 3471 HF patients (56% black, 41% white, and 3% other) found that mortality was lowest in participants with QRS duration ≥150 ms compared with <120 or 120 to 149 ms.2 Similarly, Linde et al found no difference in mortality among women with LBBB compared with women whose QRS was <120 ms.13 These inconsistencies in the data highlight the complexity of the relationship between QRS duration and mortality.
Limitations
The results of this analysis may not be representative of the overall HF population, given that the cohort was identified by patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. However, this cohort is comparable with registry data of acute HF, where over 60% of patients have an ischemic etiology of disease.36 We were unable to screen for ICD or CRT at the time of initial cardiac catheterization and could not reliably determine which patients received an implantable device after the index catheterization. Follow‐up data on medication use was also limited and unreliable, and therefore, neither implantable device nor medication data were used in multivariable modeling. In order to assess the true association of QRS duration on mortality, we excluded patients with paced rhythms. This may have excluded patients with CRT devices that could have impacted mortality. We performed a sensitivity analysis including individuals with paced rhythms and RBBB and found similar results. This analysis is subject to the limitations of retrospective cohort studies. Although we used a multivariable model to adjust for potential confounders, residual measured and unmeasured confounding may impact our findings. Finally, over 65% of patients in this data set had a QRS duration <120 ms and 14% had a QRS duration ≥150 ms. It is possible that there is an association between QRS prolongation and mortality; however, because of low event rates among those with wide QRS, we may be underpowered to detect this difference.
Conclusions
In this cohort of HF patients with LVEF <35%, QRS prolongation and LBBB was more common among white patients than black patients and LBBB was more common among black and white women than their male counterparts. A higher prevalence of LBBB has important clinical implications among black and white female HF patients who may preferentially benefit from CRT compared with men who have systolic HF. Finally, we found that QRS duration was not associated with mortality among white patients, but modest QRS prolongation was associated with increased mortality among black HF patients.
Sources of Funding
This study was supported by the Boston Scientific‐Duke STrategic Alliance for Research (BD‐STAR). Dr Randolph was supported by NIH Postdoctoral Training in Cardiovascular Clinical Research Grant No. T32 HL 69749‐11 A1.
Disclosures
Dr Thomas reported consultant and grant support from Boston Scientific. Dr Kutyifa reported grant support from Boston Scientific and Zoll.
References
- ↵Baldasseroni S, Opasich C, Gorini M, Lucci D, Marchionni N, Marini M, Campana C, Perini G, Deorsola A, Masotti G, Tavazzi L, Maggioni AP; Italian Network on Congestive Heart Failure I . Left bundle‐branch block is associated with increased 1‐year sudden and total mortality rate in 5517 outpatients with congestive heart failure: a report from the Italian Network on Congestive Heart Failure. Am Heart J. 2002;143:398–405.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵Badheka AO, Singh V, Patel NJ, Deshmukh A, Shah N, Chothani A, Mehta K, Grover P, Savani GT, Gupta S, Rathod A, Marzouka GR, Mitrani RD, Moscucci M, Cohen MG. QRS duration on electrocardiography and cardiovascular mortality (from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey‐III). Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:671–677.
- ↵
- ↵Aro AL, Anttonen O, Tikkanen JT, Junttila MJ, Kerola T, Rissanen HA, Reunanen A, Huikuri HV. Intraventricular conduction delay in a standard 12‐lead electrocardiogram as a predictor of mortality in the general population. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4:704–710.
- ↵
- ↵Walsh JA III., Prineas R, Daviglus ML, Ning H, Liu K, Lewis CE, Sidney S, Schreiner PJ, Iribarren C, Lloyd‐Jones DM. Prevalence of electrocardiographic abnormalities in a middle‐aged, biracial population: Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study. J Electrocardiol. 2010;43:385.e381–389.
- ↵Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, Krueger S, Kass DA, De Marco T, Carson P, DiCarlo L, DeMets D, White BG, DeVries DW, Feldman AM; Comparison of Medical Therapy P, Defibrillation in Heart Failure I . Cardiac‐resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2140–2150.
- ↵Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, Klein H, Brown MW, Daubert JP, Estes NA III., Foster E, Greenberg H, Higgins SL, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD, Wilber D, Zareba W; Investigators M‐CT . Cardiac‐resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart‐failure events. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1329–1338.
- ↵Goldenberg I, Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Foster E, Goldberger JJ, Santucci P, Shinn T, Solomon S, Steinberg JS, Wilber D, Barsheshet A, McNitt S, Zareba W, Klein H; Committee M‐CE . Predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in the multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial with cardiac resynchronization therapy (MADIT‐CRT). Circulation. 2011;124:1527–1536.
- ↵Piccini JP, Hernandez AF, Dai D, Thomas KL, Lewis WR, Yancy CW, Peterson ED, Fonarow GC; Get With the Guidelines Steering C, Hospitals . Use of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients hospitalized with heart failure. Circulation. 2008;118:926–933.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵Williams ES, Thomas KL, Broderick S, Shaw LK, Velazquez EJ, Al‐Khatib SM, Daubert JP. Race and gender variation in the QT interval and its association with mortality in patients with coronary artery disease: results from the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease (DDCD). Am Heart J. 2012;164:434–441.
- ↵Holmqvist F, Thomas KL, Broderick S, Ersboll M, Singh D, Chiswell K, Shaw LK, Hegland DD, Velazquez EJ, Daubert JP. Clinical outcome as a function of the PR‐interval‐there is virtue in moderation: data from the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease. Europace. 2015;17:978–985.
- ↵Bart BA, Shaw LK, McCants CB Jr., Fortin DF, Lee KL, Califf RM, O'Connor CM. Clinical determinants of mortality in patients with angiographically diagnosed ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1002–1008.
- ↵Harris PJ, Lee KL, Harrell FE Jr., Behar VS, Rosati RA. Outcome in medically treated coronary artery disease. Ischemic events: nonfatal infarction and death. Circulation. 1980;62:718–726.
- ↵
- ↵Baldasseroni S, Gentile A, Gorini M, Marchionni N, Marini M, Masotti G, Porcu M, Maggioni AP; Italian Network on Congestive Heart Failure I . Intraventricular conduction defects in patients with congestive heart failure: left but not right bundle branch block is an independent predictor of prognosis. A report from the Italian Network on Congestive Heart Failure (in‐CHF database). Ital Heart J. 2003;4:607–613.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵Liao L, Kong DF, Shaw LK, Sketch MH Jr., Milano CA, Lee KL, Mark DB. A new anatomic score for prognosis after cardiac catheterization in patients with previous bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1684–1692.
- ↵Stone CJK, Koo CY. Additive splines in statistics. In Proceedings of the Statistical Computing Section ASA. Washington, DC; 1985;45–58.
- ↵Wang NC, Maggioni AP, Konstam MA, Zannad F, Krasa HB, Burnett JC Jr., Grinfeld L, Swedberg K, Udelson JE, Cook T, Traver B, Zimmer C, Orlandi C, Gheorghiade M. Clinical implications of QRS duration in patients hospitalized with worsening heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. JAMA. 2008;299:2656–2666.
- ↵Sotoodehnia N, Isaacs A, de Bakker PI, Dorr M, Newton‐Cheh C, Nolte IM, van der Harst P, Muller M, Eijgelsheim M, Alonso A, Hicks AA, Padmanabhan S, Hayward C, Smith AV, Polasek O, Giovannone S, Fu J, Magnani JW, Marciante KD, Pfeufer A, Gharib SA, Teumer A, Li M, Bis JC, Rivadeneira F, Aspelund T, Kottgen A, Johnson T, Rice K, Sie MP, Wang YA, Klopp N, Fuchsberger C, Wild SH, Mateo Leach I, Estrada K, Volker U, Wright AF, Asselbergs FW, Qu J, Chakravarti A, Sinner MF, Kors JA, Petersmann A, Harris TB, Soliman EZ, Munroe PB, Psaty BM, Oostra BA, Cupples LA, Perz S, de Boer RA, Uitterlinden AG, Volzke H, Spector TD, Liu FY, Boerwinkle E, Dominiczak AF, Rotter JI, van Herpen G, Levy D, Wichmann HE, van Gilst WH, Witteman JC, Kroemer HK, Kao WH, Heckbert SR, Meitinger T, Hofman A, Campbell H, Folsom AR, van Veldhuisen DJ, Schwienbacher C, O'Donnell CJ, Volpato CB, Caulfield MJ, Connell JM, Launer L, Lu X, Franke L, Fehrmann RS, te Meerman G, Groen HJ, Weersma RK, van den Berg LH, Wijmenga C, Ophoff RA, Navis G, Rudan I, Snieder H, Wilson JF, Pramstaller PP, Siscovick DS, Wang TJ, Gudnason V, van Duijn CM, Felix SB, Fishman GI, Jamshidi Y, Stricker BH, Samani NJ, Kaab S, Arking DE. Common variants in 22 loci are associated with QRS duration and cardiac ventricular conduction. Nat Genet. 2010;42:1068–1076.
- ↵Jeff JM, Brown‐Gentry K, Buxbaum SG, Sarpong DF, Taylor HA, George AL Jr., Roden DM, Crawford DC. SCN5A variation is associated with electrocardiographic traits in the Jackson Heart Study. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2011;4:139–144.
- ↵Jeff JM, Ritchie MD, Denny JC, Kho AN, Ramirez AH, Crosslin D, Armstrong L, Basford MA, Wolf WA, Pacheco JA, Chisholm RL, Roden DM, Hayes MG, Crawford DC. Generalization of variants identified by genome‐wide association studies for electrocardiographic traits in African Americans. Ann Hum Genet. 2013;77:321–332.
- ↵Tracy CM, Epstein AE, Darbar D, DiMarco JP, Dunbar SB, Estes NA III., Ferguson TB Jr., Hammill SC, Karasik PE, Link MS, Marine JE, Schoenfeld MH, Shanker AJ, Silka MJ, Stevenson LW, Stevenson WG, Varosy PD, Ellenbogen KA, Freedman RA, Gettes LS, Gillinov AM, Gregoratos G, Hayes DL, Page RL, Stevenson LW, Sweeney MO; American College of Cardiology F, American Heart Association Task Force on Practice G, Heart Rhythm S . 2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update of the 2008 guidelines for device‐based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. [corrected. Circulation. 2012;126:1784–1800.
- ↵
- ↵Mentz RJ, Greiner MA, DeVore AD, Dunlay SM, Choudhary G, Ahmad T, Khazanie P, Randolph TC, Griswold ME, Eapen ZJ, O'Brien EC, Thomas KL, Curtis LH, Hernandez AF. Ventricular conduction and long‐term heart failure outcomes and mortality in African Americans: insights from the Jackson Heart Study. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8:243–251.
- ↵Konstam MA, Gheorghiade M, Burnett JC Jr., Grinfeld L, Maggioni AP, Swedberg K, Udelson JE, Zannad F, Cook T, Ouyang J, Zimmer C, Orlandi C; Efficacy of Vasopressin Antagonism in Heart Failure Outcome Study With Tolvaptan I . Effects of oral tolvaptan in patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure: the EVEREST Outcome Trial. JAMA. 2007;297:1319–1331.
This Issue
Jump to
Article Tools
- Race and Sex Differences in QRS Interval and Associated Outcome Among Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic DysfunctionTiffany C. Randolph, Samuel Broderick, Linda K. Shaw, Karen Chiswell, Robert J. Mentz, Valentina Kutyifa, Eric J. Velazquez, Francis R. Gilliam and Kevin L. ThomasJournal of the American Heart Association. 2017;6:e004381, originally published March 20, 2017https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004381
Citation Manager Formats
Share this Article
- Race and Sex Differences in QRS Interval and Associated Outcome Among Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic DysfunctionTiffany C. Randolph, Samuel Broderick, Linda K. Shaw, Karen Chiswell, Robert J. Mentz, Valentina Kutyifa, Eric J. Velazquez, Francis R. Gilliam and Kevin L. ThomasJournal of the American Heart Association. 2017;6:e004381, originally published March 20, 2017https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.116.004381